Conflicting Positions but Common Interests: An Analysis of the United States Antidumping Policy Toward China

By: Qinglan Long

 

According to the Tariff Act of 1930, “dumping” is the sale of goods imported from a foreign county at less than their “fair value” on the domestic market.2 Thus, a good produced and sold in China for twenty dollars, but sold in the United States for only fifteen dollars, may be considered “dumped” on the U.S. market. The lower price may be explained by the exporter’s desire to gain market share or to monopolize the receiving market by selling its merchandise at a lower price.3 After domestic manufacturers are driven out of the market, the dumping manufacturer will recoup its initial losses by charging a higher price. Dumping practices result in injured domestic industries. To counteract its negative effects, countries have devised rules against dumping.4 These rules, intended to nullify the impact of dumped merchandise on the domestic market, vary depending on the country from which the product originated and consider the various production factors and costs of the merchandise.

Download Article (PDF)

Un Arco Iris de Lentes con los que Mirar: La Protección del Color Único Como Marca en Los Estados Unidos, en España, y en la Unión Europea

By: Glenda Labadie-Jackson

 

Se vaticina que imicamente tendrdn una s6lida y duradera presencia en los complejos mercados contempordneos las marcas que se sirvan de estimulos multisensoriales con el objetivo de acaparar la atenci6n de los consumidores.3 En diversos ordenamientos juridicos, 6ste ha sido el motor que ha propulsado la ampliaci6n del repertorio de signos o simbolos potencialmente elegibles para fungir como marcas de productos o servicios. De aqu6l1os, vale destacar los que tipicamente suelen agruparse bajo la riibrica de “no tradicionales”, a saber: los sonidos, los aromas, los sabores, las formas tridimensionales y los colores. 4

 

Download Article (PDF)

Through the Looking Hole of the Multi-Sensory Trademark Rainbow: Trademark Protection of Color Per Se Across Jurisdictions: The United States, Spain, and the European Union

By: Glenda Labadie-Jackson

 

An oft-asserted prediction states that only trademarks that stimulate all five senses with the objective of attracting the consumer’s attention will acquire a firm and durable presence in today’s complex marketplaces.3 This, in turn, has provoked the broadening of the repertoire of signs and symbols potentially eligible to serve as trademarks for products or services. Vivid examples of these are the sounds, scents, flavors, colors and three-dimensional forms, which collectively, are grouped under the generic category of “non-traditional trademarks.”4

 

Download Article (PDF)